The END of the world- ‘WARM’ BEER CRI$I$

News, Personal growth 1 Comment »

ECO-THREAT TO ALES
SOMETHING MUST CHANGE !!!

By DAVID K. LI

April 22, 2008 — High beer prices are on tap, and global warming could be to blame.

The environmental crisis has hit suds-lovers where it hurts most - at the bar and in the wallet - as prices of grains and hops soar, activists said yesterday.

“When we’re trying to deal with young people, you have to define issues that are attractive to them, and this is something that’s caught their attention,” said Matthew Silverstein, president of the Queens County Young Democrats, which was set to host a “Save the Ales” forum last night on the impact of global warming on beer prices.

As global temperatures rise, radical shifts in weather and more parched lands are making it harder to grow grains and hops, activists and beer makers agreed.

Kelly Taylor, brewmaster for Kelso of Brooklyn beers, said his customers have paid between 10 and 15 percent more in the past year. He warned that more hikes are inevitable.

“I think prices are going to be going up every year - steep price increases,” Taylor said. “My malt prices went up by 50 percent in one year.”

Taylor, whose brewery is in Clinton Hill, said hops and grains were in short supply worldwide.

“We saw a drought in Australia, a bad harvest in Europe, flooding in Germany and hailstorms in the Pacific Northwest. Across the board, we saw significant rises in the price of grains and hops,” he said.

The beer man chalked up the wild weather to global warming but said many of his customers don’t take the issue seriously enough.

“Some people are just calling it a bad year,” he said.

Shane Welch, brewmaster at Six Point Craft Ales, in Red Hook, Brooklyn, said even small brewers are locking themselves into costly, long-term deals for hops and grains at hefty annual price boosts.

But even with those deals in hand, Welch said, it doesn’t assure brewers will have the ingredients they need.

“You can sign all the contacts you want to guarantee a price and certain amount of pounds - but who’s to say they’ll even have that product available?” the veteran brewmaster said.

“If there’s none to go around, then what?”

Microbreweries like Six Point and Kelso could be hit especially hard.

“It’s going to have an impact on a slot of small craft breweries, this is going to shake out a lot of people who can’t deal with these price increases,” Welch said.

“It’d be one thing if you’re talking about costs going up 10 to 20 percent over a few years. We’re talking 50, 70, 120, 200 percent on certain strains, the most sought-after hops.”

david.li@nypost.com

Trash in the Ocean as Far as One Can See

News No Comments »

 

Feds Want to Survey, Possibly Clean Up Vast Garbage Pit in Pacific

JUSTIN BERTON / San Francisco Chronicle 30 oct 2007

 

The so-called Great Pacific Garbage Patch, a stewy body of plastic and marine debris that floats an estimated 1,000 miles west of San Francisco, is a shape-shifting mass far too large, delicate and remote to ever be cleaned up, according to a researcher who recently returned from the area.

But that might not stop the federal government from trying.

Charles Moore, the marine researcher at the Algalita Marina Research Foundation in Long Beach who has been studying and publicizing the patch for the past 10 years, said the debris — which he estimates weighs 3 million tons and covers an area twice the size of Texas — is made up mostly of fine plastic chips and is impossible to skim out of the ocean.

“Any attempt to remove that much plastic from the oceans — it boggles the mind,” Moore said from Hawaii, where his crew is docked. “There’s just too much, and the ocean is just too big.”

The trash collects in one area, known as the North Pacific Gyre, due to a clockwise trade wind that circulates along the Pacific Rim. It accumulates the same way bubbles gather at the center of hot tub, Moore said.

A two-liter plastic bottle that begins its voyage from a storm drain in San Francisco will get pulled into the gyre and take weeks to reach its place among the other debris in the Garbage Patch.

While the bottle floats along, instead of biodegrading, it will “photodegrade,” Moore said — the sun’s UV rays will turn the bottle brittle, much like they would crack the vinyl on a car roof. They will break down the bottle into small pieces and, in some cases, into particles as fine as dust.

The Garbage Patch is not a solid island, as some people believe, Moore said. Instead, it resembles a soupy mass, interspersed with large pieces of junk such as derelict fishing nets and waterlogged tires — “an alphabet soup,” he called it.

Also, it’s undetectable by overhead satellite photos because it’s 80 percent plastic and therefore translucent, Moore added. The plastic moves just beneath the surface, from one inch to depths of 300 feet, according to samples he collected on the most recent trip, he said.

By Moore’s estimation, the “floating landfill” is also simply too far from land to conduct any meaningful cleanup operation. It’s about 1,000 miles west of California and 1,000 miles north of the Hawaiian Islands — a week’s journey by boat from the nearest port. It swirls in a convergence zone located about 30 to 40 degrees north latitude and 135 to 145 west longitude.

There’s no doubt that a stew of marine debris exists in the convergence zone of the gyre, said Holly Bamford, an oceanographer and director of the marine debris program at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, but there is some debate as to its size.

Moore has led most of the research and publicity surrounding the Garbage Patch, so Bamford said her federal agency, which oversees ocean conditions, is collecting its own data to assess the area and density.

Bamford said she has noted some “gaps in the research” that suggest the affected area is not as large as Moore estimates. Yet there’s no question that marine debris is gathering in the area and is having a negative impact on marine life, such as fish who mistake the particles for food.

“But before we embark on a huge removal process,” Bamford said, “we need to understand what we’re dealing with.”

Bamford added that the agency had attempted to take satellite photos of the area last year, but the overhead photos were inconclusive. “It’s hard to distinguish a whale reaching the surface versus a piece of plastic,” she said.

Still, Bamford said the agency is considering flying unmanned aircraft that can be launched from boats to skim the ocean’s surface and collect data.

But launching the drones is 18 months away, Bamford said. It could be two years before a federal plan is enacted to remove the plastic — if it’s warranted, Bamford said.

“Once we get to that stage, we’d need to ask, ‘If we can remove it, what would be the best way? And what would we do with it afterward? If we collect it, would we bring it back to shore — and then what, put it in a landfill?’ ”

In the meantime, as the production and the use of plastic continue to grow, so will the Garbage Patch, Moore said. The only way to reduce marine debris, all sides agree, is to cut it off at its source — on land.

The dramatic growth in plastics use over the past two decades is what distresses activists like Moore. The annual production of plastic resin in the United States has roughly doubled in the past 20 years, from nearly 60 billion pounds in 1987 to an estimated 120 billion pounds in 2007, according to a study by the American Chemistry Council, which represents the nation’s largest plastic and chemical manufacturers.

Keith Cristman, a senior director of packaging at the American Chemistry Council, said the plastics industry is aware of its connection to marine debris and said the council is working with federal and state agencies to put more recycling bins on California beaches in an attempt to stop plastic bottles and bags from making their way to the sea.

At the end of November, Cristman said, the council is co-sponsoring its first marine debris workshop with state and federal agencies.

Cristman said he’d rather see more plastic recycled than production slowed.

“Plastic is a valuable resource,” he said. “It shouldn’t be wasted, it should be recycled.”

Asked if the council would assist in any cleanup of the Garbage Patch if the federal government called on it, Cristman said, “We’re always interested in working with NOAA and the EPA.”

Moore said his crew had collected new data that suggested more plastic is entering the gyre, yet he was hesitant to elaborate until he finalized the research.

“The ocean is downhill from everywhere,” Moore said. “It’s like a toilet that never flushes. You can’t take these particles out of the ocean. You can just stop putting them in.”

More on plastic in the oceans

 Map of Plastic

 

source: 30oct2007

To send Mindfully.org your comments, questions, and suggestions click here
The home page of this website is www.mindfully.org
Please see our Fair Use Notice

News from the Hill: Senate passes clean energy tax credits bill

News No Comments »
News from the Hill: Senate passes clean energy tax credits bill
Now it’s time to thank ‘n’ spank before the House starts work on it
 

If you’ve been wondering what happened to the bill introduced last week by U.S. Sens. Cantwell and Ensign that would, among other measures, extend solar investment tax credits for residential and commercial use, here’s some up-to-the-minute news.

By a vote of 88-8, the Cantwell-Ensign language was successfully added as an amendment to the Senate’s comprehensive housing bill (HR 3221).  This bill passed the Senate on Thursday with an estimated $6.6 billion in tax credits allocated to renewables, and including a lifting of the $2000 cap on residential solar installation credits.  (You’ll find details of how your senator voted below).

This is a landmark development on Capitol Hill, since attempts to get the Senate this far have failed three times in the last year.  Of course, on those occasions the initial impetus came from the House, and the stumbling block for the Senate was always the source of funding for the tax credits–reducing some of the government subsidies enjoyed by the oil and gas industry.  In this case it’s a Senate-originated bill, with no identified source of funding, and that means that the problem this time around may be with the House.  Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM), head of the Finance Committee’s Energy Sub-committee, has said that the House is unlikely to agree to the provisions without spending offsets.

Sponsors of the energy amendment and Senate leadership have started to work with Representatives and the White House to find a way out of the looming impasse.  And Maria Cantwell has not dismissed the idea of paying for the incentives in a tax extenders bill.

“I’m happy to look at any vehicle that’s going to move quickly,” said the Washington Senator.  “I think we have a few more weeks before these (renewable energy) projects get cancelled.”

Cantwell and her co-sponsor, John Ensign (R-NV), have argued that since the incentives would stimulate the economy, Congress should approve them without offsets.  But this argument is unlikely to sway the House, so senior Finance Democrats and the Bush Administration continue to try to find an agreeable set of offsets that would allow the renewable energy credits to be included on a larger tax extenders bill.

We don’t yet know when, or in what form, the bill will be brought before the House, or what kind of fight it will face there or at the White House.  But with Senate passage at least, a step that has been impossible for a year has finally been taken.

Many of you phoned or e-mailed your senators to urge them to vote for clean energy, and 88 of them did!  To all of you, thanks for making your voices heard.

And now it might be a good time to thank (or spank) those senators who voted.

The eight holdout senators who voted against the Cantwell-Ensign amendment were:

Alexander (R-TN), Bunning (R-KY), Byrd (D-WV), Carper (D-DE), Dodd (D-CT), Kyl (R-AZ), Sessions (R-AL) and Voinovich (R-OH)

And the four who did not cast votes at all?  They were the three presidential candidates (who may well have been otherwise occupied), and Elizabeth Dole (R-NC).

Why not TAKE ACTION NOW  and send thanks ‘n’ spanks to your senator(s)?  All you have to do is enter your ZIP code below and GO!

 
Take Action Now! Enter Your Zip Code:
 

Tell a Friend

Al Gore: New thinking on the climate crisis

News No Comments »

 WE are the generation to turn this around

Gore has a new presentation. A must see if you have children or relatives that will be living on earth in 100 years.
Share with others

YouTube Preview Image

“If you want to go quickly , go alone. If you want to go far , go with others.”
         We have to do both to stop global warming.

-Tim Padden
House of Solar

What’s the Latest on that Energy Bill?

News No Comments »

What’s the Latest on that Energy Bill?

March 24, 2008At the end of February, the U.S. House of Representatives went “once more unto the breach” in an attempt to create long-term extensions for renewable energy tax credits.

And just as had happened twice before, the bill (on this occasion the Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax of 2008, H.R. 5351) passed the House comfortably. The final vote was 236 - 182 with 11 members of the House not voting, and was largely split along party lines.

In a joint statement, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer and sponsor of the bill Charles Rangel said: “The bill extends and expands tax incentives for renewable electricity, energy and fuel, as well as for hybrid cars, and energy efficient homes, buildings, and appliances. It does not add to our deficit, but rather repeals $18 billion in tax subsidies for Big Oil companies. By strengthening our renewable energy sector, the bill will help create the next generation of good-paying, green collar jobs and bring down energy prices in the long term.”

Of course, it’s that “$18 billion in tax subsidies for Big Oil” that has stymied similar bills before, with Senate Republicans closing ranks in the face of intense lobbying from that very sector of American industry. And the Bush Administration has already issued a letter indicating that the president will veto a bill that rolls back tax breaks for the oil and gas industry, so all eyes are now on the Senate: can the Finance Committee find sources of revenue for renewable energy tax credits that are less objectionable to the GOP and the White House?

We understand that in this interim period between House and Senate votes, Finance Committee members are working hard to find common ground between opposing positions. There are other potential sources of revenue out there that could sway enough Republicans to switch their vote when the bill comes to the Senate floor in late April–enough to avoid a filibuster, perhaps enough even to overcome a veto–but it’s going to take a lot of haggling on the Hill to make everybody play nice.

Postscript: We’re told—by Oil and Gas—that Oil and Gas needs those tax breaks to finance exploration for new sources of oil and gas. What a difference three years makes. Here’s President Bush on 5/14/2005:

“And so one of the initiatives that I will push, again, is to get an energy bill out. I will tell you with $55 oil we don’t need incentives to oil and gas companies to explore. There are plenty of incentives. What we need is to put a strategy in place that will help this country over time become less dependent. It’s really important. It’s an important part of our economic security, and it’s an important part of our national security.”

http://www.solar-nation.org/2008/03/24/whats-the-latest-on-that-energy-bill/

The Senate May Kill 42 GW of Planned Renewable Energy

News, Tech No Comments »

The Senate May Kill 42 GW of Planned Renewable Energy
Written by Hank Green Wednesday, 05 March 2008

While the U.S. House has happily passed the renewable energy credits that have, for the last few years, kept the U.S. competitive with other countries in this burgeoning new economy, the Senate has failed to pass the legislation three times.

The largest planned solar power project in history, a 280-megawatt solar thermal plant in Arizona, will not be built if the tax credits are not extended. But that’s not where the story ends. Over 42,000 MW — that’s as much as 75 coal-fired power plants — are hinging on this bill. Those projects, representing the largest yearly growth in U.S. solar EVER, will go online in 42 states only if the subsidies stay in place.

The renewable energy credits will expire at the end of 2008 and already planned projects are putting in a provision saying that they will cancel if the credits are not passed. The problem seems to be that every version of the renewable energy credit bill that has hit the Senate takes subsidies away from oil and gas companies and gives them to the renewables energy. Pete V. Domenici of New Mexico, the head Republican on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, has said that he will block any such legislation, calling the repeal of their subsidies a “tax” on oil and gas.

Many Senators claim that ending oil and gas subsidies will only serve to increase gas prices but, call me crazy, giving taxpayers’ money to the oil companies so they can lower prices doesn’t really make that much sense. We could just give the money straight to the taxpayers instead of helping to increase the already-record profits of the oil industry.

Subsidies exist to help bolster new economies when they need the capital, not to prop up dying systems. If our country can put together the funding to create 42 gigawatts of renewable energy, that will be something that we can all be proud of. That, in fact, will stop the demand for new coal power plants while putting us in a position to compete with the rest of the world in this new energy economy.

Senate Democrats are scrambling to put together a stand-alone version of the bill. The last two have failed by just one vote (notably, John McCain did not vote on either bill) and Democrats are confident that they can pull that extra vote from somewhere before their effectual deadline at the end of the first quarter of ‘08. Let’s hope they get this done…NOW.

why-john-mccain-is-not-the-candidate-to-stop-global-warming

The Story of Stuff- Great to watch

News, resources No Comments »

stuff

GOP should stop coddling Big Oil, make way for renewable energy

News, resources No Comments »

By Barry Cinnamon
Article Launched: 02/26/2008 01:32:34 AM PST

This week the House of Representatives will vote on the Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2008. This act would eliminate $18 billion in tax breaks for oil companies to help pay for extending renewable energy tax credits. If the House approves, we’ll see if Senate Republicans can vote for good energy and environmental policy - or just vote for Big Oil again.

We’ve been through this before. In December, at the urging of the White House, Senate Republicans voted along party lines to defeat a similar bill. This year, Republican opposition to this bill and favoritism to Big Oil are becoming themes of the presidential campaign.

The result is that solar power and other forms of renewable energy have become politicized, much to the detriment of everyone who uses electricity and cares about the environment.

We are fortunate to have leaders in California who understand both the need and the potential for the renewable energy industry. Sparked by the California Solar Initiative - Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s “Million Solar Roofs” program - investments in clean tech and related technologies have exploded in California. On a local level, Mayor Chuck Reed’s “Green Vision” will create 25,000 new jobs in Silicon Valley as we move toward a future of 100 percent renewable power, alternative fuel vehicles and wastewater recycling.

So it looks like the next new thing is clean tech: silicon for solar cells as well as chips. But there’s a cloud on the horizon - the

federal government’s apparent hostility to any industry that has the potential to impede Big Oil. We’ve seen this with absurdly lame corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards, the Environmental Protection Agency’s refusal to allow California to regulate its own emissions and the outright obstruction of the Kyoto Protocol’s efforts. I’ve been a registered Republican for more than 20 years. This year I find it impossible to support a party that bends to the wishes of Big Oil. Their excuse is that the White House does not want to reduce incentives for finding new sources of oil and gas. We’ve obviously got an energy shortage, but let’s put these renewable energy incentives in perspective.

Renewable energy legislation that Republicans should pass moves $18 billion in tax incentives from Big Oil to the renewable energy industry over 10 years. In 2007 alone, the profits of the top five oil companies were more than $120 billion - at the current pace, they’d generate $1.2 trillion in profits during the same 10-year period.

Sound public policy is compromised when there is that much money at risk by incumbent industries. As a result, many people in the renewable energy industry are resigned to wait until the next president takes office for any substantive change in federal policy. But that delay will jeopardize thousands of Silicon Valley jobs, cost our local economy billions of dollars and, compared with the rest of the world, puts us just that much farther behind.

It’s an opportunity lost for the most obvious of reasons - Big Oil’s influence on our country’s energy and environmental policies. The impact is now being felt economically as higher energy prices create inflationary pressures. Our economy is going into a recession while our country writes continually bigger checks to foreign oil producers.

Big Oil does not need tax breaks while they’re earning record - some say windfall - profits. Senate and House Republicans need to wake up to the fact that their continued votes for Big Oil are embarrassing and politically suicidal. Our country’s energy policies are an economic and environmental dead end, and we cannot wait until next year to turn around. Let’s get an energy bill passed now that removes unnecessary support for Big Oil and accelerates the growth of clean, renewable power.

 


BARRY CINNAMON is CEO of Akeena Solar.

McCain Ducking a clean future for our country

News No Comments »

Two weeks ago John McCain was the only Senator to duck a crucial vote
on the future of clean energy in America — dooming to failure the
measure that would have helped make renewable energy more affordable
and accessible. Now it turns out this missed vote is part of a
pattern.

Last week, the League of Conservation Voters (LCV) released the 2007
National Environmental Scorecard giving Senator McCain a score of
ZERO. According to the scorecard, McCain was the only member of
Congress to skip all 15 crucial environmental votes scored by LCV.

Can you help spread the word about McCain’s 0% environmental voting
record and write a letter to the editor? The opinion page is widely
read in most communities — and a well-placed letter can reach a broad
audience. We’ve included sample text to get you started.

McCain’s LCV score exposes the real record behind the rhetoric — a
lifetime LCV score of 24, a history of siding with the polluters and
special interests, and a consistent pattern of ducking important
environmental votes.

Let’s place thousands of letters in papers around the country. Click
here to let us know you’re writing a letter.
http://action.sierraclub.org/site/PageNavigator/LCVLettertotheEditor

Thanks for taking action.

Sincerely,

Carl Pope
Executive Director
The Sierra Club

Utility-Scale Solar Power Plant Planned for McCain’s State Needs Solar Tax Credits To Survive

News No Comments »

 Arizona Public Service Co. (APS) has announced plans for one of the world’s largest solar facilities – a 280-megawatt (MW) concentrating solar power (CSP) plant – to be built 70 miles southwest of Phoenix, near Gila Bend, AZ.

A ‘power tower’ type of CSP plant
near Seville, Spain; photo credit: Abengoa

The project is enthusiastically supported by Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano. However, its viability is dependent on the long-term extension of investment tax credits for solar facilities, which have gone down to defeat twice since December in the U.S. Congress. On both occasions, ironically enough, Arizona senator and presidential candidate John McCain was absent for the crucial vote.

Read more about the Solana CSP generating station here.

WP Theme & Icons by N.Design Studio
Entries RSS Comments RSS Log in