A palindrome of life

Broadcasts No Comments »
YouTube Preview Image

A palindrome reads the same backward as forward. This video reads the exact opposite backward as forward. Not only does it read the opposite, the meaning is the exact opposite.
This is only a 1 minute, 44 second video and it is brilliant.   Make sure you read as well as listen…forward and backward.
This is a video that was submitted in a contest by a 20-year old.   The contest was titled “u @ 50″  by  AARP. This video won second place. When they showed it, everyone in the room was awe-struck and broke into spontaneous applause.  So simple and yet so brilliant. Take a minute and watch it.

Why to help Haiti

News No Comments »

For those of you that still tune into the house of solar I thought I would put this out as a message. I think this guy gets it the way it needs to be gotten.  Do what you can.

If you are wondering, Citizenre continues to chug along by completing installs in southern California.  It will need to gain momentum to cause a shift . Lets keep our fingers crossed for that cause also.

-Tim Padden

YouTube Preview Image

Forged Letter #14 Against Climate Bill

News No Comments »
YouTube Preview Image

Above: In this TV ad, funded by the VoteVets.org PAC, Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans ask the Senate to pass the Waxman-Markey climate and energy bill.

House investigators have discovered another forged letter sent to a Virginia representative in June, urging him to vote against the Waxman-Markey climate and energy bill.

As The Washington Post reports, this brings the total number of fakes up to 14 so far — all coming from Bonner & Associates, the PR firm that was working for the pro-coal lobby group American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity in the run-up to the House vote.

Like the previous baker’s dozen, this letter was made to look as if it were from a grassroots community organization. This time, rather than evoke sympathy for the concerns of the aging, or people of color, this letter pulled patriotic heartstrings, by appearing to come from a local American Legion post.

The letter lauded the continued use of coal-fired energy, and urged Rep. Tom Perriello (D-Va.) to vote against the Waxman-Markey bill.

Read More »

The girl who silenced the world for 5 minutes

Uncategorized No Comments »
YouTube Preview Image

I thought you should know

News Comments Off

Watchdog sees huge U.S. bill for banks bailout
Financial bailout’s cost to U.S. could total almost $24 trillion

WASHINGTON - The federal government has devoted $4.7 trillion to help the financial sector through its crisis, a watchdog report said Monday.

Under the worst of circumstances, the report said, the government’s maximum exposure could total nearly $24 trillion, or $80,000 for every American.

The figures are part of a tough new quarterly report to Congress from special inspector general Neil Barofsky, who accuses the Treasury Department of repeatedly failing to adopt recommendations aimed at making one component of the government financial rescue effort more accountable and transparent.

The $4.7 trillion commitment to the industry equals about one third of the overall U.S. economy and takes into account about 50 initiatives and programs set up since 2007 by the Bush and Obama administrations as well as by the Federal Reserve. Barofsky oversees one of the initiatives — the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program.

Much of the government assistance is backed by collateral and Barofsky’s $23.7 trillion estimate represents the gross, not net, exposure that the government could face. No one has suggested that the full amount will be used.

Because of declining participation in short-term loan programs and because some infusions of money have been repaid, the maximum amount actually spent has declined to a current outstanding balance of $3 trillion, Barofsky said.

The agencies and the programs assisting the financial sector include a newly created Federal Housing Finance Agency, increased deposit insurance initiated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., and 18 support programs created by the Fed under the special powers it can deploy to address a systemwide financial crisis.

Banks have cut back on their use of the Fed’s emergency lending program as well as other programs to ease credit stresses. Given that, the Fed has reduced the amount it will lend to financial institutions under two programs and it has decided to let a program to support money market mutual funds to expire as currently scheduled at the end of October.

Barofsky’s $23.7 trillion estimate represents the maximum exposure that the government would face if all eligible applicants requested the maximum assistance at the same time. It does not account for the fees and other costs that some of these programs charge and for the collateral that many of the programs require that participants provide.

“While quantity and quality of the assets backing all of these programs vary, ignoring that side of these programs misrepresents ‘potential exposure’ associated with them,” Treasury spokesman Andrew Williams said.

In his report, Barofsky says Treasury has accepted some of his recommendations for greater accountability, but says the department has not taken steps to require all TARP recipients to report on their actual use of funds. He said Treasury also should report the values of its investments in banks and other financial institutions, disclose the identity of borrowers under a nonrecourse loan program and disclose trading activity under a public-private investment fund.

Barofsky says Treasury’s inaction means taxpayers have not been told what the financial institutions that have received assistance are doing with the money.

Barofsky’s conclusion is contained in a quarterly report to Congress and in testimony he is prepared to give Tuesday to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

“The very credibility of TARP (and thus in large measure its chance of success) depends on whether Treasury will commit, in deed as in word, to operate TARP with the highest degree of transparency possible,” Barofsky said.

PS . Contrary to what I often hear in Texas . This did not happen in the last 5 month . This has been building for years.

When to switch off your lights

resources No Comments »

Lights Out (iStockPhoto)

Does switching the lights on and off use more energy than leaving them on? The answer is no, despite the common misperception that turning a light on creates a power surge. The thinking is that it’s more economical to just leave a light on rather than pay the costs of flicking it back on.

In reality, that “surge” lasts for only a fraction of second, according to Francis Rubinstein, a staff scientist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Any “start-up” energy costs are minuscule at best and are more than offset by the money you save from turning your lights off, even if it’s only for a short time.

So if you’re strictly concerned about saving energy (and money), you should turn your lights out when you’re not using them.

The bigger issue with turning lights on and off frequently, though, has to do with shortening the product’s lifetime, says Christina Kielich at the Department of Energy.

It doesn’t affect the lamp life of an incandescent bulb very much, says Rubinstein. So it makes sense to always turn them off when you a leave room, even if it’s only for a few minutes.

Compact florescent light bulbs, on the other hand, are a somewhat different story. Flicking them on and off repeatedly will affect how long they last, although, Rubinstein points out that the impact is minimal for most households.

How much flicking on and off is too much? The general consensus is that it’s best to turn off CFLs when you are leaving for 15 minutes or longer. In fact, Energy Star recommends installing florescent bulbs in fixtures that are used for at least 15 minutes at time. So it doesn’t make sense to use them in places where you’d need to switch them on and off constantly.

The rule of thumb is a little different when you’re at the office, according to Rubinstein. Turn out florescent lighting when you’re leaving for at least 5 minutes. The reason? Full-size florescent systems aren’t as sensitive to frequent cycling as CFLs and won’t impact the life of the bulb as much.

Are You Going to Finish Strong?

Personal growth No Comments »

I have not posted in a while but this video really caught my eye and I thought I would share it with the team.

YouTube Preview Image

As a side note , I like everybody else am waiting to Citizenre to move forward. I receive daily emails about the status of the company checking to see if anything has changed over the last couple of years. There seems to be new possibilities that come up e very week but the company has stayed in the ideation stage. Is that going to change ? We all have to wait and see what results are created.

When we do launch , we will be the ones to launch the company into the solar lead.

Tim Padden
House of Solar

Stop Bush’s Last Attempts to Weaken Standards

Bush is an Idiot No Comments »
Spotlight Action

November 2008

Stop Bush’s Last Attempts to Weaken Standards

Support LCVPresident Bush may be a lame duck, but he can still do irreparable harm to the environment. The Bush Administration is in the midst of a last-minute push to weaken environmental standards, like allowing drilling in Arches National Park.  These are regulations that would be difficult or impossible for the Obama Administration to reverse.  Send a message to EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson, and Secretary of the Interior, Dirk Kempthorne today to protect our planet! 

Click here send a message!

A great reason to vote !!!! Today

From the Forums, Uncategorized No Comments »
YouTube Preview Image

VOTE ** VOTE** VOTE** VOTE

Uncategorized No Comments »

YOU ARE THE LANDLORD OF THIS HOUSE. CAST YOUR VOTE TODAY !!!

White_House

WP Theme & Icons by N.Design Studio
Entries RSS Comments RSS Log in